The value of co-education from 3 to 18
One of the most obvious features of OLA is that we are a co-educational school. Until the 1960s most schools, as OLA was at the time, were single-sex, but all that changed in the state sector with the creation of the comprehensive system. Independent schools flew the flag for educating boys and girls separately much longer and, even in 2005, of the 598 independent schools covering the secondary age range in England, just under half were still single-sex. By 2019, things had moved on again, with only a fifth of independent schools remaining this way, the vast majority being day schools or girls’ boarding schools.
A unique redoubt of the old way of doing things is the Oxford and Abingdon area, where nearly all private schools educate children separately even now. In some cases this is combined with a highly academically selective entry, mostly consisting of children from families of higher earners. Children who attend these schools therefore tend to mix not only just with others of their own sex, but also with those who are similar to them socially and intellectually. The ever-present danger here is the cultivation of a rarefied, hothouse atmosphere, quite unlike the world as it is experienced by the vast majority of their peers.
How does OLA fit into this picture? We clearly differ from the prevailing model in at least two respects, in that we admit even numbers of boys and girls from Nursery to Sixth Form of a broad range of academic ability. I would also argue, though it is difficult to prove, that the profile of our families is more varied than in some local independent schools. Whether this is true or not, we are certainly blessed by a body of staff, parents and children who share our outward-looking approach and combine to make OLA a remarkably happy environment, where young people are taught to use their talents for the good of others and not purely for selfish gain.
Why does any of this matter? The schools I have mentioned above are, like us, all excellent institutions and some of them have the cachet of being major players on a national scale, places to which some parents will aspire because of the name as much as the offering. Should we form judgements about the educational and social model such schools provide, or is a diversity of approaches admissible, both in the state and independent sectors, giving parents an enviable choice as to the kind of school in which to educate their children? Choice is important, since some parents inevitably aspire to institutions that prove unattainable for their children, whether on grounds of cost, gender or ability.
Excessive dogmatism is best avoided, especially given the different stories people have. My own background is a case in point. As a child I attended a mixed state school followed by a single-sex independent school, my move to the private sector only made possible by a scholarship. My first school was mainly attended by Catholic children and had a very wide social and academic range, while the latter was essentially non-selective and much more the habitat of the middle classes, as well as having a broader religious mix. Both were very good schools. Added to this, I had many friends in the local area who attended neither school and who were from a variety of races and religions, a point sometimes overlooked when people worry about the supposed narrowness of certain schools.
By the time I went to university I had been well-prepared academically but, like many boys of the time, felt well out of my depth when meeting the opposite sex. This is not something that OLA’s pupils will experience as they launch into Freshers’ Week. The chance for boys and girls to develop side by side, often with their siblings of both sexes, is clearly one of the great advantages of a school such as ours. This, combined with the possibility of a child remaining at one school from Nursery to Upper Sixth, in a nurturing environment where class sizes are kept small, is what makes OLA unique. Our aim, as ever, is to make as many parents as possible aware of this, so that those who are attracted by it choose it for their children, finding a perfect fit from the many offerings available.
The direct link between lack of sleep and academic success
How much sleep do your children get? Is it enough? Do you know if it’s enough? What are the main factors that go towards children having difficulty falling asleep? Lack of sleep is currently one of the major issues affecting children’s academic performance in schools, their sociability and even their ability to stick to a healthy diet. Reliable academic research has shown that if children do not get the sleep they need, all of the above can suffer. The problem has increased exponentially in the last decade but has not up to now received the same attention as other issues afflicting our children, such as stress and obesity resulting from junk food and lack of exercise.
Most parents are familiar with the sleepless nights that come with babies and the trouble some very young children have with establishing good sleep patterns. Eventually, however, things usually settle down and, as their children grow into toddlers, parents can finally enjoy an undisturbed night’s sleep. Or maybe not. It’s been shown that this won’t be the case if the child is exposed to an endless diet of television and entertainment on the iPad in the crucial hour before bedtime.
Mummy and daddy may think they are buying themselves a bit of time by plonking Junior down in front of his/her favourite cartoon, but they will pay for it later when the child resolutely refuses to fall asleep. A clear link has been established between the two events. Children who have been deprived of electronic devices in the run-up to bedtime not only fall asleep quicker but have been shown to perform better in school. Furthermore, they are even less likely to crave the wrong kind of food in the morning if they wake refreshed, having had the right amount of sleep for their age.
We all know that it’s best to avoid too much alcohol and caffeine if we want an untroubled night between the sheets, but how many of us ensure that we spend the last hour of the day away from our screens? In tricking the body into believing that it’s daylight, our devices prevent the release of the hormone melatonin, whose function it is to encourage the body to let go. If this is bad for adults, how much worse for growing children who are far less likely to be able to cope with sleep deprivation.
Reading about this recently, I reflected on the days when I was a Housemaster to forty Year 9 boarders. The highlight of the week was the Saturday night film on the big screen, which the boys would watch eating pizza and swilling fizzy drinks. When I look back at how difficult it was to get them to settle down to a good night’s sleep afterwards, I am not at all surprised. Fifteen years ago, however, I didn’t make the link between their evening routine and the problems in the dorms that followed.
What can we do about this? Many children like to keep their phones with them at night. They want to be able to read and respond to the texts their friends are sending and not to be left out of the discussion. Woe betide any parent that dares to step into this minefield. Yet all parents wish their children to do well at school and, if the science shows that there is a direct link between lack of sleep and academic success, not to mention a healthy and happy life, why don’t more take action to break the cycle?
As awareness of the problem grows things will surely begin to change, and indulgence in screen time before lights out may well be added to smoking, drinking and poor diet as the hallmarks of a troubled youth. If the research is right, we need to take this problem more seriously.
Why should students choose OLA 6th?
On Wednesday this week we enjoyed a very busy Open Morning for parents exploring both our Junior and Senior Schools. The sun even shone briefly through the clouds to welcome our visitors. Events like this always provide an excellent opportunity for us to take stock and define again what marks OLA out from other schools. At times I am challenged to spell out our ‘Unique Selling Point’ or, as schools generally prefer to call this, our ethos. In short, what is the special quality we have that would make parents want to send their children to OLA rather than somewhere else?
This is especially relevant at the moment for our Year 11 pupils, who have all been meeting individually over the last few weeks with Dr Lawson and Mrs Sharkey to discuss what OLA’s Sixth Form has to offer them. What will they find in OLA 6th and what will encourage them to complete their school journey here rather than seeking another setting? Excellent teaching is one very important thing, but there has to be more to it than that.
Perhaps the best word to sum up what our Sixth Form will give them is ‘enrichment’. While A Level is the core of Sixth Form study, our offering is a great deal broader. As they prepare for university, we want our senior students to develop their intellectual, social and leadership capacities in ways that will enrich them for the rest of their lives. To this end, a programme is provided to cater for these wider aspects of education, meaning that students are not simply left to fend for themselves. By doing this we avoid the excessive specialisation inherent in the A Level system and offer something more akin to the International Baccalaureate.
The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) forms part of this enrichment, giving students a chance to research a topic of their choice and develop their interest in it. This usually culminates in an extended piece of writing and a presentation to their teachers. Last year I very much enjoyed supervising two EPQ students, one of whom investigated the state of football refereeing in this country, while the other examined the rise of political correctness and restrictions on freedom of speech. Both developed some fascinating ideas and clearly gained an enormous amount from the chance this gave them to learn the skills of academic research.
This year I am introducing a select group of Lower Sixth Formers every Monday to the western philosophical tradition and what it means to think philosophically. This is one of several courses that have been offered to this year group in addition to the A Level syllabus. My aim here is to help the students see that the intellectual disciplines they have been studying at school, and which they will go on to study at university, derive in large part from the remarkable insights of the ancient world and the thinkers influenced by them.
Starting with the pre-Socratics and moving onto Plato and Aristotle, I encourage the students to consider the ideas of these great thinkers and the impact they have had on western civilisation over two and a half millennia. I have taught a similar course in other schools and always find that students know very little of this background unless they happen to study Classical subjects or Religious Studies. Scientists and mathematicians are generally unaware of how their subjects have developed from these beginnings and of the intellectual impetus that gave them birth.
Despite the intense focus on exam success that characterises our educational climate – contributing in part to the current crisis in our children’s mental health – there remains a place for the kind of broad intellectual formation that the best independent schools provide. By opening students’ eyes to the riches of this heritage, we can give them an impetus to life-long learning and promote a spirit of intellectual curiosity well beyond the examined curriculum. Our Sixth Form Enrichment classes and the wonderful ideas currently emerging from the EPQ programme show that this spirit is alive and well at OLA.
Freedom, the good, intellect and service – explaining the OLA ethos
Parents considering an OLA education for their children can sometimes be uncertain what we mean when we say that the school is Catholic. What difference does this actually make on a day to day basis? is the question most likely to be asked. People can even be worried that, if they are not Catholic, the school is not for them. Occasionally, the ugly word ‘indoctrination’ rears its head and concerns are expressed that children will be drilled to accept a set of values and doctrines with which they themselves disagree or, at the very least, will make them feel uncomfortable.
Nothing could be further from the reality of life at OLA. The very fact that more than 70% of our pupils do not come from a Catholic background is testament to this. When I meet prospective parents, they often want to know how our ethos benefits all our pupils, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, something I am very keen to explain. To do so, I sometimes quote what Pope Francis told a group of schoolchildren when asked to sum up what Catholic education means for him. As ever, he showed his ability to encapsulate in a few words what many people have struggled to express in whole volumes, stressing the holistic nature of the education we provide.
‘Our schools,’ he explained, ‘broaden not only your intellectual dimension, but also the human one. I would like to focus on two fundamental values: freedom and service. Before all else, be free persons! Freedom means knowing how to reflect on what we do, knowing how to evaluate which are the behaviours that make us grow. It means always choosing the good. Being free to always choose the good is challenging, but it will make you persons with a backbone, who know how to face life, courageous and patient persons. The second word is service. In your schools you participate in various activities that prepare you not to be wrapped up in yourselves or in your own little world, but to open yourselves to others, especially to the poorest and most in need, to work to improve the world we live in.’
This is so good that it practically absolves me from having to write anything else! Freedom, the good, intellect and service: these words put in a nutshell what it means to be a Catholic school. Our aim is, as Francis says, to set children free to be themselves, to release their potential and become the people their gifts and talents show that they can be. Cultivation of the mind goes hand in hand with developing the whole person, ensuring that our pupils develop a moral sense in an increasingly value-free world.
One of the many people who have been inspired by this vision is none other than Sir Michael Wilshaw, Britain’s former Chief Inspector of Education. In an interview Sir Michael, formerly head of a Catholic school, declared: ‘It doesn’t need me to tell you that we are living in an increasingly secular and materialistic society where young people can so easily have their heads turned and lose sight of what really matters.’ He went on to express his support for schools whose ethos focuses on what does ‘really matter’, this being in Sir Michael’s view far more than a narrow focus on league tables. Given some people’s perception of the school inspection process as being a dreary obsession with data and measurable targets, this was an interesting comment from such a source, to say the least.
Society does indeed run the risk of promoting a narrowly utilitarian approach to education, rather than embracing the holistic vision championed by Pope Francis. Intellectually curious young people, challenged to explore what makes life worth living, are far more likely to develop into balanced, well-rounded adults than those drilled in a more narrow philosophy. Schools such as OLA create environments that make this happen.
OLA at the heart of the Abingdon community
OLA’s Book Week, masterminded by our Librarian Megs Bowers and Head of English Kate Thompson, has been an undoubted high point of the school year so far. Open events, such as Wednesday’s visit by award-winning children’s author Jo Cotterill, have attracted a large and enthusiastic audience. Not only this, but Jo is a former pupil of OLA who greatly amused the assembled budding authors with tales of her attempts at story-writing at school. Anything that inspires children to write can only be good thing and I was delighted to see how well Jo’s talk was received. It is always a particular joy to welcome visitors to the school, many of whom are children and teachers from local primary schools.
All this comes at a time when the contribution independent schools make to the wider community is in the spotlight as never before. At the Society of Heads’ Autumn meeting, which I attended in London last week, we heard two sobering talks focussing on the current political threats to the sector, one delivered by the Chief Executive of the Independent Schools Bursars’ Association, David Woodgate, the other by Julie Robinson, CEO of the Independent Schools Council.
Their message was clear. The recent vote at the Labour Party Conference to move towards abolishing schools like OLA and the success of the anti-independent school campaign group Abolish Eton mean that the very existence of our schools is under threat. Schools such as OLA therefore need to redouble their efforts to engage with their local communities and ensure that people understand what an integral part of the local landscape we are, and indeed have been throughout our long and distinguished history. If OLA and the other Abingdon independent schools didn’t exist, not only would the local economy suffer but the whole educational landscape would be massively impoverished.
Every year we at OLA conduct an audit of the ways in which we work in partnership with the state sector and the local community and it’s become clear how extensive these are. Book Week is just one of many examples of how events at OLA are opened out to local schools and the public at large, as is the use of our sports facilities and swimming pool by so many in the Abingdon community. We also have close historical links with the parish of Our Lady and St Edmund next door and raise thousands of pounds every year for local and diocesan charities.
Our highly successful Open Morning last Saturday was an excellent opportunity for us to show off the outstanding education we offer to many who might never have been to OLA before. Independent schools come in many different shapes and sizes and not all have the vast resources of the larger public schools like Eton. I stressed in my Open Morning speech that, while we are a small school, we still succeed in delivering an excellent education to a whole range of pupils from many different backgrounds. We encourage pupils in Year 6 and Year 11 to apply for the many bursaries and scholarships on offer and, as a Catholic school founded on the principle of mercy, are acutely conscious of our duty to help those who find themselves in trouble.
In addition, OLA’s staff, including those in senior leadership, work as governors in the state system, developing through this an understanding of the things we have in common and the challenges we all face. As OLA’s Principal, I regularly attend meetings of my fellow Catholic head teachers in the Portsmouth diocese and share experiences with state school colleagues. The characterisation of independent schools as somehow remote from real life and unaware of the difficulties people have does not, therefore, bear close inspection. We have been developing partnerships over many years and the current political climate can only be seen as a challenge to do more. OLA has been at the heart of the Abingdon community since its foundation nearly 160 years ago and it is our aim to keep it that way!
A lesson from Sir James Dyson
We learned this week that billionaire businessman and inventor Sir James Dyson has donated more than £18 million to his old school, Gresham’s in Norfolk, to fund the building of a science and technology centre. The head of Gresham’s, whom I know from his time as a fellow member of the Society of Heads, is a very lucky man. It’s been my hope for quite a while that one of our alumni will come forward with a similar amount for OLA, but so far no such luck.
Sir James is quoted as saying: ‘Gresham’s isn’t wholly focused on exams. There are other things in life. I think it was that combination of being able to do those things in a creative, relaxed atmosphere that set me on the road of wanting to create and build things.’ He admits to having been something of a slacker at school, preferring to spend his time sailing, running, acting and performing in the orchestra.
Schools today are incredibly wary of describing themselves as ‘relaxed’. They fear that parents will equate this with poor results and won’t want to send their children there. Creativity, on the other hand, is generally regarded as a good thing, so long as it doesn’t get in the way of achieving a string of Grade 9s.
A few years ago a survey conducted by the charity TLG revealed some very troubling attitudes. A poll of more than 1,000 parents found that pressure to get good results meant most of them were more worried about their children’s academic progress than about their happiness or bullying:
Chief executive of TLG, Tim Morfin, commented: ‘There’s so much pressure now, it feels, around educational performance and how best to help our children succeed, and that’s getting harder as exams are getting more difficult. It feels like our kids have got to do really, really well [at school] to make a success of life.’
There is clearly something in what Morfin says. I have noticed myself that, even in the last few years, parents’ worries about academic outcomes have increased. This could be to do, as Morfin suggests, with a perception that exams are getting harder, but also with worries that employment prospects for graduates have shrunk and that the path to a good degree is more important than ever. In some ways this is ironic, given the eagerness of top universities in recent years to recruit the best students as tuition fees have risen.
The emphasis that policy makers and the media now put on league tables and academic results contribute to this trend. There is far more coverage of GCSE and A Level results in the press than ever before, and I recently read another article speculating that the pictures posted every year of students leaping in the air as they receive their results put subliminal pressure on parents to ensure that their own children achieve the same.
Schools themselves feel under constant pressure from government to improve results year by year and there is keen competition, especially among independent schools, to demonstrate this. The result can be highly stressful for teachers, with the danger that they pass on their anxieties to pupils and their parents. Surveys and stories about teenagers’ mental health currently abound and there can be little doubt that the pressure our children feel is real. We must not make this worse by fostering an environment where academic progress, important though it is, is prioritised over personal happiness and fulfilment.
At OLA, well-being and attainment have always gone hand in hand. Time and again we have seen that good academic outcomes follow when students are comfortable in themselves. I am proud that our children have the kind of education enjoyed by Sir James, where the range of activities on offer and the encouragement of creative subjects like Art, Design and Technology and Textiles give pupils the chance to develop more naturally than in an academic hothouse.
Our current most famous alumna, Bake Off star Rosie Brandreth-Poynter, is an excellent example of what an OLA education can bring you. Not only did Rosie go on to qualify and practise as a vet, she has also clearly found the time to cultivate the culinary talents that impress the Bake Off judges week after week. If she knows any alumni – or indeed anyone at all – who have £18 million to spare, we would be keen to hear from them.
What is education for?
As well as being a very important question, this is also the title of a book written by the former chief executive of the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority, Dr Nicholas Tate. Dr Tate, who was also headmaster of Winchester College and director general of the international school of Geneva, is well qualified to address this topic. A few years ago he gave one of the most interesting talks I have ever heard at a Society of Heads conference, quoting from his book and challenging the heads present to consider the purpose of the education delivered in their schools. What he had to say was highly relevant to OLA.
Dr Tate’s book is subtitled ‘The views of the great thinkers and their relevance today’. Starting with the ancient Greeks, he examines writers from Thomas Aquinas to Immanuel Kant and Hannah Arendt to see what common themes emerge from more than two thousand years of reflection on education.
He identifies ten. These include:
• The need to see education ‘as a central part in a long chain of cultural transmission’
• The importance of promoting the values that have given us the freedom we enjoy in the West
• The recognition that education must, first and foremost, engage with children’s minds and provide for them a vision to which they will wish to aspire.
Without this vision, he says, ‘we are likely to end up with education systems distorted by an excessive concern for utilitarian considerations: the alleged needs of the knowledge economy and whatever priorities for social engineering governments have decided to set themselves at any particular time.’
Now, it is of course perfectly understandable that governments should wish to justify spending on education by pointing to how it feeds into the economy. We do not have the luxury of pouring millions of pounds into courses that lead students nowhere. It could, in fact, be argued that in the past not nearly enough has been done in the UK to promote vocational qualifications and that these are still undervalued. There will always be a need for courses specifically designed to educate students for work in the marketplace and these have a vital place in the educational landscape.
However, says Tate, this must never be the whole story. An education purely devoted to utility is just as undesirable as one excessively concerned with, say, Science or Classics. Watching Boris Johnson’s visit to Pimlico Primary School last week, I heard him telling pupils that he had spent 20 years at school and university studying nothing but Classics. I couldn’t catch whether he went on to say what good he felt this had done him, but he is certainly on record as supporting the teaching of Latin in primary schools and is not alone among prime ministers in having studied Classics at Oxford.
But even the most die-hard Classicist, passionate about the skills, knowledge and values that can be transmitted to pupils by teaching them the languages and culture of Greece and Rome, would be unlikely to support a return to the position enjoyed in the curriculum by classical languages in the 19th century, or even the one enjoyed by Mr Johnson at the Eton of the 1970s.
Tate isn’t advocating anything like this either, but he does feel that ‘the best way to prepare for adult responsibilities and opportunities is never to lose our focus on the wholeness of the human beings we are educating, encompassing as such a focus does their character, virtues, values, intellect and culture.’ If the students who leave our schools and universities are mere technocrats, expensively educated robots who have not been given a vision of what it is to be a human being, the future will, says Tate, look bleak for society. We will have lost what is most precious in the western educational tradition, rooted as it is in the wisdom of the ancient Greeks and the authentic humanism of the Christian tradition.
This is surely a position with which we at OLA can agree. In fact, the education we offer is fully signed-up to it. Our focus is on developing human wholeness and providing an education based on the nurturing of character and culture. The cultivation of such virtues as integrity, compassion and courage, placed within an intellectual formation that draws on the riches of the western tradition, is key to what we are as a school. When we celebrate our 160th anniversary in 2020 and hold our alumni reunion, I am fully expecting to meet a group of people embodying these values!
What is education for? I will leave the last word to Pope Benedict XVI, whose speech to Catholic schoolchildren at St Mary’s University College, Twickenham in 2010 still informs the vision we have of education at OLA: ‘A good school provides a rounded education for the whole person. And a good Catholic school, over and above this, should help all its students to become saints.’
I wonder what Boris would make of this.
A national scandal! How should we respond to the UK’s unhappy childhood trend?
The beginning of the new academic year is invariably an uplifting time when children, bored by now with the summer holidays, return with renewed vigour to school to catch up with their friends and embrace a more structured regime. The last few days at OLA have had this flavour and it has been a delight to see our pupils returning, so obviously eager for the term ahead. Shakespeare’s ‘whining schoolboy, with his satchel and shining morning face, creeping like snail unwillingly to school’ emphatically does not describe this year’s intake, except perhaps where it comes to the shining faces. ‘Beaming’ would be an even better description. Our pupils are full of joy and life. Not only that, but some of them, unlike Shakespeare with his ‘small Latin and less Greek’, have just performed brilliantly at these languages at A level and GCSE, producing a beaming face on Miss Smith as well!
That said, I must now strike a more sombre note. Readers may remember that in May I gave my reflections on the 2018 Good Childhood Report, which showed that pressure to fit in is making our children increasingly unhappy, with alarming numbers self-harming. The 2019 report, produced by the Children’s Society, has just been published and gives even more alarming news. Children in the UK are now apparently the least happy they have been since the survey began in 2009. Overall happiness among 10 to 15 year-olds has dipped below 8 on a scale of 1 to 10, down from a high of 8.21 in 2011. The Children’s Society has called this a national scandal.
So what is going on here? The report is based on an annual survey of around 2,400 households. It revealed a significant dip in contentment in the areas of friendships and school among both boys and girls, happiness with friends dropping from an average of 8.99 out of 10 in 2009-10 to 8.59. 11.8% of children were found to be unhappy with school, the highest level since the survey began. There was also an increase in unhappiness among boys about their appearance. Historically, boys have been happier about their appearance than girls, but the gap appears to be closing.
The survey also investigated the worries that children have, finding that what troubles them most is crime and the future of the environment. Whether they will have enough money in the future is also a major concern, closely followed by whether they will find a job. About a quarter of children were found to have worries about Brexit. Not surprisingly, low levels of life satisfaction and high levels of depression were linked to financial strain. Interestingly, there was no significant change in children’s happiness with their families.
The trends in the 2019 report are based on data gathered between 2009-10 and 2016-17, so we don’t know yet how the children of 2019 feel about these things or whether, in the last two years, the trends have been reversed. It would be interesting to ask the same questions to our own pupils at OLA. My guess is that some of the concerns would be similar (friends, personal appearance, the environment) and others different (happiness at school, job prospects).
Asked why he was unhappy with his appearance, one of the boys surveyed said that the models, weightlifters and bodybuilders he had seen on Instagram made him feel that he looked ‘like a stick’, and some commentators have suggested that the popularity of Love Island among teenagers has exacerbated these kinds of anxieties. If you think you need to look like a model to fit in, you’re quite likely to feel that you don’t.
We need to remember that the majority of children are still saying they are happy – it’s the trends that are disturbing. Mark Russell, chief executive of the Children’s Society, has commented: ‘Modern childhood is a happy and carefree time for most, yet for too many it is not. It is a national scandal that children’s unhappiness is increasing so quickly’.
How worried should we be about this increase and what can be done about it? At OLA, PSHE lessons, assemblies and the retreats at High Leigh give our pupils opportunities to discuss these questions. But they, like us, cannot escape the society they are in and their happiness will to a large extent depend on how they deal with what is thrown at them in everyday life. As parents and teachers, we can help them navigate these waters by providing sound guidance based on the wisdom we ourselves have acquired, even if our own childhoods happened in radically different times.
We can also try to be role models, living examples of how anxiety and unhappiness need not be the last word when adversity strikes. Young people might not seem to be paying much attention to the adults in their lives, but they notice more than we might think. If we can get across to them that a certain amount of unhappiness in life is inevitable but that this need not be the end of the world, we will have achieved something important.
‘So you’ll be winding down for the end of term, then?’
This is a comment often made to me as we enter the last few weeks before a break. When I hear it I feel like responding: ‘No, I’ll be winding up.’ Towards the end of term the whole school community begins to flag, but these are often the times when we are at our busiest. Reports need to be written on top of all the usual marking and preparation, while the end of term (particularly the summer one) is peppered by a variety of events, all of which need, in military terminology, ‘prior preparation and planning’. A steady nerve and an appetite for hard work, combined with late nights, early mornings and a general disregard for communication with your family, are required in these challenging times.
It is, of course, all worth it in the end and invariably everything goes through with only the tiniest of hitches. There is also the consolation to be gained when the wheels do finally stop churning, emails thin to a trickle and you wake up to find that that elusive thing, the ‘holiday’, has actually come. Over the years, the correspondence columns of newspapers have periodically been filled with debates as to whether the teaching profession is a bunch of hapless layabouts, unable to face the real world, or a shining conglomerate of workaholic saints, entirely devoted to the nation’s youth, even in the middle of the summer holidays. The truth clearly lies somewhere in between, but I do confess to being infuriated when the tag ‘those who can, do, those who can’t, teach’ is dragged out for the umpteenth time. PE teachers even have to put up with Woody Allen’s variation ‘those who can’t do, teach. And those who can’t teach, teach gym.’ Some even unkinder people have suggested that those who can’t teach become headmasters.
The problem for teachers is that everyone has been to school, which can lead some to think they know all about how a school should be run and the kind of life teachers lead. This, combined with the fact that teachers have ‘all those holidays’, can give rise to some unpleasant invective in the letters columns, especially when teachers are grumbling about pensions, pay and workloads.
But back to the end of term. I was talking to one of our retiring members of staff earlier this week and asked him whether he was enjoying his last few days in the school and contemplating with satisfaction the many years of service he has given to OLA. He told me that he was far too busy to give any thought to either and was simply concentrating on getting to the end of the week. This reminds me of a dilemma that was once put to my class by my RE teacher at school: ‘What would you do if an angel appeared and told you that you had one hour to live?’ The answer he gave was: go on exactly as before. His reasoning was that, if you live your life with integrity and aim to give of your very best at every moment of your life, you should have no reason to fear when the day of reckoning comes.
Not that retirement is as final as this, and I know that the colleague concerned has a wealth of ideas for the next few months that should keep him very busy indeed. To quote Jean-Pierre de Caussade, writing on the need to focus on the present and not wish your life away: ‘The present moment holds infinite riches beyond your wildest dreams, but you will only enjoy them to the extent of your faith and love. The more a soul loves, the more it longs, the more it hopes, the more it finds. The will of God is manifest in each moment, an immense ocean which the heart only fathoms in so far as it overflows with faith, trust, and love.’
The Amazing Clare Moore
Most people who know something about the history of OLA are aware that the convent and school were founded by Mother Clare Moore, an Irish Sister of Mercy after whom our Clare Moore Auditorium takes its name and where we will be holding our Prize Giving and Leavers’ Mass today. However, I do not think it is sufficiently appreciated what an extraordinary person she was.
At the time when she first came to Abingdon in November 1859, Mother Clare was superior of the Sisters’ Bermondsey convent, the first Catholic religious house to be built in London since the Reformation. She has been described by the historian Theresa Meehan as a ‘tall, slim, attractive young woman, very energetic and with a lively personality’. This is despite the fact that for the whole of her life her health was poor. Her sister wrote of her when she died: ‘She entered (religious life) when she was little more than sixteen, not without a severe mental struggle. How she lived so long is wonderful for her lungs were diseased when she was fourteen and continued so for many years after, I know, perhaps to the last.’
In 1832, Clare spent an intensive seven-month period being trained as a nurse at the time of the first great cholera epidemic in Dublin, working long, hard days at the city’s Townsend Street Depot Cholera Hospital under the direction of Catherine McAuley. Since the Reformation and the tragic destruction of the system of medical and social services that the monasteries had provided, nursing in the British Isles had been practically non-existent. With no professional nurses to look after them, the sick and poor suffered appalling neglect for over three centuries.
It took the Crimean war of 1854-1856 to wake people up to how desperate things were. Newspapers caused a furore by reporting that hundreds of soldiers were dying in agony in hospitals in Scutari because of the absence of nursing provision for British servicemen. While French soldiers were cared for by skilled nurses provided by the Sisters of Charity, a British soldier was forced to write to The Times asking why his compatriots were being left without aid. ‘Why’, he asked, ‘have we no Sisters of Charity?’
As everyone knows, it was Florence Nightingale who stepped into the breach. Determined to do something, she had visited Paris and Alexandria to observe the nursing of the Sisters of Charity and had worked as superintendent of a London home for invalid gentlewomen. In 1854, at the request of the British government, she assembled a small group of 14 lay nurses, 14 nurses from Anglican sisterhoods and 10 Catholic nuns and travelled to the hospitals at Scutari. The work she did here showed the British authorities what professional nurses could do.
Clare Moore and four other Sisters of Mercy made up half the contingent of Catholics, joining Florence Nightingale at the behest of the archbishop of Southwark, Dr Grant. The two women formed a close working relationship that quickly blossomed into friendship. Clare’s ability to remain calm during times of crisis was of immense support to Florence. As Therese Meehan has written: ‘During the day she assisted Florence with managing the hospital and at night she tended the soldiers on the wards. She advised Florence on a daily basis, mediated disputes, and helped her to stay calm during the immense stress of their work, for which Florence was very grateful. “I am not like my dear Revd Mother who is never ruffled,” Florence wrote.’
The two women remained close friends until Mother Clare’s death in 1874. In a letter to her in 1863, reflecting on their work together in the Crimea, Florence wrote: ‘How I should have failed without your help… I wondered so much that you could put up with me – I felt it was no use to say to your face, either then or since, how much I admire your ways’. The editor of the women’s lifelong correspondence, Mary C. Sullivan, has written of Clare: ‘Her governing powers were extraordinary… she was fit to rule a kingdom.’
Jerry Barrett’s well-known painting ‘The Mission of Mercy: Florence Nightingale receiving the Wounded at Scutari’, now in the National Gallery, shows the two friends at the Barrack Hospital there. A copy of it hangs in my office and I am reminded daily of the remarkable Mother Clare, who travelled to Abingdon one winter’s day in 1859 to begin the long and fascinating history of OLA.